-->

03 January 2023

Sin-levelling, Abuse, Abusers, and Romans 3.23: a Remonstrant’s Repudiation of ‘Christianised’ Stupidity

J. D. Gallé | Tuesday, 3 January 2023

        Self-professed Christian counsellors who, whether in theory or practice, engage in sin-levelling, that is, the deceptive art of treating all manner of sins and sinners as more or less equal in nature, are neither wise nor fit to counsel. Human lives are placed in peril with the gross mishandling and misapplication of scripture by ill-qualified, albeit degreed and (possibly) well-intentioned, ‘professionals’.
        Persons who are properly identified as abusers are exceptionally hardened and evil sinners with exceptionally corrupted minds, who engage in exceptionally evil deception and evil deeds. The character of the abuser is nearer to that of the Evil One than the generality of lost humankind.
        In Romans 3.23, Paul the apostle testifies to the reality of universal Jewish and Gentile sinfulness and failure to honour God. Negatively, if one were to follow Paul’s line of thought from chapters one to three in his epistle to the Romans, it should be evident that the apostle is not arguing that all persons who have sinned are equal in terms of the magnitude of their guilt before God, or that all persons are equally morally depraved or equally hardened in their hearts. Such ideas are foreign to the context. Romans 3.23 should not be employed as a proof text, therefore, in service of the view that all sinners are essentially equal in terms of their badness or corruptness.
        Scripture neither permits nor demands of us that we divest ourselves of (un)common sense. In summary, of the concept of sin-levelling we may swiftly and unashamedly say no to ‘Christianised’ stupidity.

Copyright © J. D. Gallé, 2023. All rights reserved.


Addendum (4 Jan. 2023).  I make no personal claim of having either discovered the concept of ‘sin-levelling’ or coining the term. If anyone is aware of, or able to pinpoint via an accurate citation, the origin of the aforementioned expression, please apprise the readers (and me) in the comment section of this article (below).
        That said, it is likely that my awareness of the term first arose from the A Cry for Justice blog some years ago. See the link to the following web page:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments and constructive criticism are welcome, preferably from persons of a thoughtful, non-hostile disposition. All comments are moderated by the author/host of The Neo-Remonstrance blog.

Guidelines for commenters are as follows: (1) remain relevant to the subject matter of the article/blog post under which you are commenting; (2) attempt to be reasonably concise in your response (although several paragraphs may be acceptable); (3) refrain from leaving comments that are vitriolic or puerile in nature; (4) avoid ad hominem argumentation and caricatures. Comments that deviate from these standards will likely not see publication on this website, along with messages that constitute ‘spam’.

For all other comments, corrections, enquiries, suggestions, or remonstrations, please scroll to the bottom of the page and fill out the contact form below.